#Xojo try not working code#
Tim, I anticipate your reply: “Well, of course when Xojo N+1 comes out you must do a thorough review of ALL your exception handling code, you can’t just expect old code to work in a new IDE!” but this gets back to my (and Kem’s, and others’s) point : using Tim’s coding style, any new Exception added to the language/framework may break existing code. If your “catch only certain exceptions” code is not updated for this new exception, then you are asking for trouble, and you will end up booking seats and not paying for them. If you write code like Tim says (only catching specific exceptions) then you run the following risk: Xojo version N+1 comes out, and Xojo has added a new “FoobarVoodoException” (indicates when the Frangulator has Rebizzled). If anything goes wrong the entire transaction must be rolled back. A classic example would be a transaction that must be atomic, such as “1. That’s your opinion, but there are many situations where the opposite is true. To relate this back to Xojo : If you surveyed users and asked are you intentionally catching ThreadEndException and EndException at all - I suspect the would be very low. It kind of just leaves you blank, said AK Mogulla, director of player personnel for football at Auburn, which has added more than a half dozen transfers, including former Michigan State quarterback Payton Thorne, in the last month. Just blithely catching all exceptions (but two) and saying “I just don’t care what went wrong” is simply asking for trouble. 17 hours ago &0183 &32 Not even a position is given for the hundreds of players who go in and out.
0 kommentar(er)
